About Me

Name: Aaron Miller
Location: Spring, TX
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

California hasn't changed

Much is being made by some commentators of the recent referendums in California. Even though little more than 20% of eligible voters participated, according to Glenn Beck, voters overwhelmingly voted against raising taxes or giving the state government more money.

This does not mean that Californians are fed up with spending gone wild. That's a possibility, but I doubt it. The more likely scenario is that Californians are not willing to pay for the programs and services they demand.

Let's face it -- affordability is rarely mentioned by politicians when they ask us what we want.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

permanent takeover

It's now being said on some talk shows that Obama's administration is selecting new board members for General Motors.

Do you understand the full significance of that? It means the government's takeover of the company is permanent. By firing the company's top decision-makers and choosing the replacements, Obama is ensuring that he will maintain control of the company even if the government officially returns it to private operation.

Now, there can be no return to the GM of old. The company belongs to liberal politicians. The change is permanent.

Our democracy is dying.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

a forgiving market

So, today the market is rallying behind the news that the government will spend still more taxpayer money to pay for toxic assets.  I'm confused. We're trusting the government now?

People, we've heard this before. The government signed a 700-billion-dollar check for the expressed purpose of buying toxic assets, and then the money was spent elsewhere. Now the government's signing an even bigger check with the same promise, and we're happy about it?

I'm not predicting will see the same scenario. It's possible, but I doubt it. Honestly, I don't know how I feel about this market reaction, but it seems a little strange.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FDIC nearly insolvent

If the FDIC goes insolvent, I'm guessing either Congress will write them a big check or Obama has an idea of how to "improve" (replace) the FDIC.
Tags: economy  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

control isn't just ownership

So the federal government now owns a larger portion of Citibank shares.

As this progresses, remember that Obama never lets all of his cards show. The government doesn't have to own more than 50% of a company's shares to control its direction entirely. All that's necessary for such control is for the government to be joined in ownership by liberal allies with similarly large investments.

And that doesn't apply only to company takeovers. In health care reform, in energy initiatives, in trade and countless other matters, allies of Obama and the far left didn't stop being allies when Obama entered office. Jeffrey Immelt, George Soros, and other such industry leaders have much political strength to offer.

This isn't conspiracy theory, by the way. It's Sociology 101. Friends help friends. Like-minded people work together to achieve common goals. You can bet Obama isn't trying to achieve his political goals with only the aid of fellow politicians. Watch for sympathetic activities in industry, in the arts, etc.

Also, I highly recommend Folsom's book, New Deal or Raw Deal. I'm only part-way into it, but already it's been extremely enlightening. You might be amazed how similar Obama's presidency has been to FDR's (and that's not a compliment). No two moments in history are exactly the same, but this book will certainly help you understand where our nation is headed.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

turning points

Most historical turning points can't be pinned down to a particular day. Oh, we try, but most of the moments we recognize as... well, momentous... are really just symbols of larger movements and events.

In 1775, Patrick Henry of Virginia gave a moving speech which includes the famous line "give me liberty or give me death!".  Though Henry is credited with inspiring the men of Virginia to join the Revolution against Britain, the Revolution had already begun. In his own words, "Our brethren are already in the field!". Doubtlessly, many men made an important decision to join the war that day. But we remember that speech to this day because it symbolizes the American spirit and why our forefathers fought that war, rather than because it was a vital moment in history.

I was reminded of Patrick Henry's legendary speech as I was reading this article about Rick Santelli's popular CNBC rant the other day and the White House response. Will Santelli's speech and this video of frustrated Chicago traders be the catalyst for a profound change in our nation's history? Probably not. But it strikes me as a moment which might well symbolize the tragic story of this current societal shift.

Anger and mistrust are on the rise in America, as conservatives are being steadily disenfrachised from our government and culture. I don't know where the country is headed, but whatever is ahead ain't pretty.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama will continue to ascend

Today, I watched Bill O'Reilly and Glenn Beck dispute whether or not the inevitable economic fallout from the recent "stimulus" bill will hurt Obama's popularity. It won't. In fact, Obama's popularity is likely to increase.

The most obvious and compelling evidence for that claim is FDR's presidency. America's economy only worsened during Roosevelt's presidency, and yet he remained so popular that he was reelected twice! He served longer than any other president in our nation's history, and is generally remembered today as one of our greatest presidents. Again, the economy did not improve under Roosevelt, yet American voters didn't turn on him.

Why not?  I'm no historian, but I know of at least two factors. First, FDR was an exceptionally skilled and charismatic orator. Second, he bought affection with pork projects for interest groups.

That should sound familiar.

Obama is a charmer and master manipulator. The complete lack of substance in his campaign and his supporters' willingness to overlook the most blatant lies demonstrate the charismatic power Obama has over the American public. He just pushed Congress to pass a "stimulus" bill that offers little stimulus, a bill that not one Congressional representative has read entirely, a bill of unprecedented size that we must pay for with money we don't have (thereby depreciating the dollar to a dangerous degree)... and yet he has the support of half the nation in doing so! A hundred obviously separate issues were legislated into a single bill and passed with little to no discussion -- that's called dictatorship.

This is only the beginning of the spending packages. TARP 2 is already in the works, and you can bet that Obama will be injecting it with more federal control. Obama will keep liberals in his pocket with pork and one-sided mandates for years to come.

Have I mentioned how terrorists might strengthen Obama's chokehold on the public? Numerous persons from intel backgrounds have suggested that America is likely to experience another major terrorist attack on home soil within the next few years; even within the next few months. If we are struck again, it's a certainty that Obama will gain power from it. Presidents always gain power after a direct attack on America, because leadership is vital during a crisis like that. And let's not forget that Obama proposed a domestic military force, nor his proposal that all citizens participate in mandatory (changed to voluntary, post-election) community service.

The bottom line is this: Obama is a man out for power. He has it, and he'll gain more over the next few years.

Our only hope -- aside from God, of course -- is for conservatives like O'Reilly to accept that America is not unbreakable. This is a great nation, but we are not immune from tyranny or de facto revolution. Americans must believe that events of historic proportions and terrible nature can occur during their lifetimes and at home. Obama is gaining a dangerous level of power, and we won't be able to resist his manipulations if we don't even acknowledge that power.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »