About Me

Name: Aaron Miller
Location: Spring, TX
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

dreams tempered with wisdom

Austin Hill reprinted the email he received from President Obama on the 4th of July this year. Within that letter is the following:

"And as America comes ever closer to achieving the perfect Union our founders dreamed"

Right there is a fundamental misunderstanding, or (more likely) a willful misinterpretation, of America's founding.

The Founders did not dream of Utopia. They did not believe they were setting the groundwork for a "perfect Union". They certainly did not believe the Constitution was merely a set of guidelines from which America would begin, as Obama's actions clearly demonstrate he believes.

No, our Founders were Christians who believed in the Fall of Man and realists who acknowledged that humanity will always be flawed. They believed that all governments, including the one they began, have a natural tendency to drift toward either dictatorship or anarchy. Read The 5,000 Year Leap and you'll see this in their own words.

The U.S. Constitution was written in response to tyranny... which is to say that it was written in response to the natural and inevitable corruption of the human heart and our limited wisdom. It was also written with hope and faith in the inherent beauty of human beings. Its authors were plainly aware, as evidenced through their own words, that neither corruption and foolishness nor beauty and wisdom can ever be completely struck from individuals or from the social systems those individuals comprise.

Furthermore, America's Founders believed that what progress which could be made would be made apart from government, not through it. They expressly asserted that government must be limited to only protection of the most basic individual rights and the facilitation of states' rights. They perceived government as a necessary burden with which one should never be comfortable.

In his actions, Barack Obama proves to be the antithesis of America's founding principles. The longer he, his fellow liberals, big-government Republicans and other cowardly politicians remain in power, the farther we will drift from the Founders' true dream... a dream in which America is defined by its individuals and its culture, rather than by its government.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

marriage isn't a state issue

The Constitution clearly designates marriage contracts as a power of the states. However, that does not mean, as is often stated, that the push for gay marriages will be kept out of federal courts, legislation, and initiatives.

Article IV, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution states: "Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state." When the Founders wrote this, they probably anticipated differences between states in how marriages are sealed and enacted, but I doubt they anticipated a movement to fundamentally redefine marriage in general. States which don't offer gay marriage licenses are already being forced to acknowledge the legitimacy of such licenses from others states. In other words, just because your state denies gays a right to marry or enter a civil union does not mean your state is not going along with the farce in one way or another.

America's Founders also did not anticipate that a federal income tax would become the federal government's primary source of income (the federal income tax and the IRS did not exist in this nation's first century of life). Therefore, the Founders did not foresee federal benefits being doled out on the basis of a marriage license. Yes, this issue has already taken form as well.

The suggestion that the definition of marriage, as being between a man and a woman, is a state issue is simple misdirection. Sometimes it's told as a lie and other times as willful ignorance, but it's always wrong. This is inescapably a federal issue.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »